| Introduction | Calibration 
  | Characterization | Conversion 
  | Software | Scanners | Monitors 
  | Output | Maintaining | How 
  Good Is Good Enough? Introduction One of the greatest challenges in producing color for print projects is making 
  sure that the colors the designer has chosen or created are the same colors 
  that are printed. In creating a project, several devices are used and no two 
  of them produce the same visual color from the same digital values. Images scanned 
  as RGB (red, green, blue) can look different when viewed on different monitors. 
  Colors viewed on a monitor can look different than the same colors output from 
  an inkjet printer or printing press, which both use CMYK (cyan, magenta, yellow, 
  black) for color reproduction. With monitors, printers and presses all using 
  different varieties of color, keeping the color consistent throughout the production 
  of a job is very challenging. You must have a basic understanding of the additive 
  and subtractive 
  color processes and use a Color Management System (CMS) in order to get consistent 
  and reliable color. The graphics industry is developing standards for color management that will 
  provide a set of rules to be followed by all those involved in the production 
  process. By following the standards, hardware and software vendors are able 
  to build cross-platform, device profile formats which characterize color devices. 
  The two standard committees addressing the issue of developing color management 
  standards are the Image Technology Committee and the International Color Consortium 
  (ICC). The ICC was started in 1993 by several of the leaders in the prepress industry 
  including Apple, Microsoft, Adobe, and Kodak. They created a standard device 
  profile format to characterize devices using the CIELab color space to define 
  colors. The standard device profile format is called the ICC profiles. A properly 
  built ICC profile accurately translates any set of RGB or CMYK values into CIELab 
  values. Before there were ICC profiles, many vendors had their own unique systems 
  which were incompatible with other systems.  
  
     
      |  Note:  CIE L*a*b* is theoretical color space 
          developed by the Commission Internationale de L'Eclairage (CIE), which 
          is an organization for setting standards for color measurement. It is 
          a color model based on L* = lightness, a* = red-green axis of the space, 
          b* = blue-yellow axis of the space.  
       |  Successful color management requires: 
  device-independent color space (CIELab) that transforms colors from one 
    color space to another (e.g., RGB to CMYK)accurate profiling to describe a color behavior of a digital color devicea good gamut mapping technology that maps colors between devices that have 
    different gamuts (e.g., scanners and monitors)  Different 
  devices (scanners, monitors, printers) use different color spaces (RGB or CMYK) 
  and each of those has a different range of colors that each device can display 
  or produce, which is known as its color "gamut", or "color range". 
  Some devices have limited gamuts and others have very large gamuts, but none 
  can produce the range of colors our eyes can detect. The color range can even 
  vary among similar devices, such as different brands of monitors. Printers vary 
  drastically in their gamuts, especially if they use different technologies. 
  Changing the ink or paper will also make a difference. A color management system 
  converts the device-specific colors into a common visual language that can be 
  used throughout the process to assure predictable color. When colors in an image 
  cannot be displayed or printed because they are not in a device's gamut, they 
  are called "out-of-gamut colors".
 When an image is scanned into the computer, only the colors within the scanner's 
  gamut are saved. When an image is viewed on a monitor, or output to a printer, 
  the colors that are produced are the colors within its gamut. Devices that use 
  different gamuts cannot reproduce each other's colors exactly. A Color Matching 
  Module (CMM) is then used to perform gamut mapping, which selects the next closest 
  reproducible color. 
 A color management system can be broken down into three categories: calibration, 
  characterization, and conversion.   Calibration Calibration is the first step in obtaining color management. It is the process 
  of tuning a device (scanner, monitor, printer, etc.) to a known or defined standard 
  to ensure that it will meet the manufacturer's specifications predictably and 
  accurately. It establishes a baseline of operation to ensure that the device 
  does not vary from the standards. Calibration should be performed quite often and some devices require it more 
  often than others. For example, if you have a color copier, you should recalibrate 
  it every eight hours or every 5000 prints. Since color copiers operate by static 
  electricity, they are drastically affected by changes in the humidity and temperature. An industry standard color reference tool used to calibrate input and output 
  devices is the IT-8 color reference target.   
 Characterization  Another 
  term for characterization is profiling, which is a process that defines the 
  color gamut of a specific device. A device profile is simply a translation table 
  between the standard color space and device-specific RGB or CMYK. The device 
  profiles are used to convert from one device to another. They measure how the 
  device differs from an industry standard, such as the IT-8 standard target. 
  Determining how the device differs is accomplished by sending a target to a 
  device, measuring the device's reproduction, and comparing the measured values 
  against the target values. This process is the same for creating profiles for 
  monitors, scanners, and output devices.
 The most accurate method for communicating color is spectral data. Spectral 
  data describes what a color is, not just how it appears or is reproduced. A 
  spectrophotometer is used to capture spectral data by measuring a color sample 
  such as a proof, print, paint chip, ink sample, etc. The spectral data information 
  is then used to create the color profiles.   Conversion  The 
  conversion function charts or maps the color gamut of one device to that of 
  another and makes the required changes in order for both devices to display 
  or produce a similar color range. The conversion process is also known as gamut 
  mapping. For example, to convert an RGB image to CMYK, the CMM (e.g. ColorSync) 
  looks up the CIELab value for the RGB and then looks up the resulting CIELab 
  value to get the equivalent CMYK value. This converts directly from RGB to CMYK, 
  resulting in both having the same color range.
 Custom profiles are important for every device in your workflow. A profile 
  for each type of paper that will be used in a printing device are also necessary.   Software One option to assist you with color management is with the use of Apple's ColorSync 
  software. Applications such as Adobe PageMaker®, Photoshop®, and Illustrator®; 
  QuarkXPress, Macromedia Freehand, and more than 90 other products, 
  all support ColorSync. ColorSync is supplied with every copy of the Macintosh 
  Operating System and is available at no charge. ColorSync is a standard for managing color in cross-platform workflows. Microsoft 
  Windows (Versions 98 and later) contain ICM2, which is Microsoft's first capable 
  color management implementation. The system uses the same Color Management Module 
  (CMM) used by default in ColorSync.  Adobe products have a gamma corrector and calibrator. Use either Adobe calibrator 
  or ColorSync, but do not use both. The Adobe calibrator will change your ColorSync 
  settings and override the lookup table. When an Adobe program is launched, it 
  checks for the ColorSync settings in the system. Some systems may use other 
  programs such as the Kodak Color Workflow.  
  
     
      | Note:  Generic profiles are available free for many monitors, 
          printers, and scanners, but the profiles are seldom of any real value. 
          Serious users should profile their own devices using hardware and software 
          available from several vendors. 
       |    Scanners Scanners are easy to profile, but you need a different ICC profile for each 
  type of original, such as one for reflective copy, transparencies, slides, etc. 
  Generally, a reflective and/or transparent IT8 target is scanned and compared 
  to the target values. A corrective profile is then created. Then when an image 
  is scanned, the driver can access the profile information and correct the color 
  on the fly.  If you have your scanning outsourced, your vendor must characterize and calibrate 
  their scanners as well. Generally, scanner profiles are in RGB, although there are ways to to create 
  CMYK profiles.   Monitors Monitors are generally the least stable in the prepress workflow. Regular calibration 
  and consistent viewing conditions are very important. To optimize the monitor, 
  make sure you are creating the ICC profile in the ambient lighting conditions 
  in which you will be using the monitor. White point is a critical issue here. 
  The appropriate white point and gamma used for printing and graphics is the 
  D50 standard and the gamma of 1.8. If the brightness and contrast are adjusted after the profile has been created, 
  the profile will be completely worthless and a new profile must be made. There are software-only solutions available such as the default calibrator 
  included with ColorSync and the Adobe Gamma Control Panel included with Photoshop 
  5. There are limitations in using the software-only solutions, such as with 
  the ambient conditions. For those who want the most control over their monitors, 
  it's best to have an external calibrator, such as a colorimeter, used with the 
  software. Currently, all monitor profiles are RGB profiles.   Output The RIP (Raster Imaging Processor) that films will be run through needs to 
  be linear so that the films represent what has been asked for. The calibration 
  of the proofing process should be checked often to make sure that exposures 
  and chemistry are maintained at the proper levels. The plating process, the 
  ink set, and the paper stock on which the profile is printed or proofed also 
  contribute to the accuracy of the profile. Using color management with a printer or press is very challenging because 
  the different substrates used affect the outcome of the color. Different paper 
  stock with different colors and different finishes all influence the way color 
  appears. Output device profiles can either be RGB or CMYK, depending on the device. 
  It is important to determine before the profiling process begins whether a device 
  is RGB or CMYK. Considerations must also be made for the total ink limit (TIL), 
  black generation (UCR/GCR), and rendering intent. These measurements are usually 
  taken with a spectrophotometer, which is usually driven by the profiling package.   Maintaining Maintaining color management is the key. Your profiles must be checked often 
  as several variables can change affecting your color.  Color management is not magic and does not happen by itself. As with any color 
  reproduction method, the stability of each device in a color-managed chain can 
  dramatically affect the whole system and good quality control is essential. 
  Color management will squeeze the best out of your equipment, but it cannot 
  improve a device's color gamut. It also does not eliminate the need for skill 
  or learning from experience. The more you know, the better the results will 
  be.   How Good Is Good Enough? With the changes in technology such as inkjet proofing, remote proofing, direct-to-plate, 
  the Web, and digital photography, color management is needed more than ever 
  to ensure quality and consistency. Some customers do not need exact color. It 
  may depend on who your customer is, what product you are producing, and what 
  its purpose is. If what you are providing is "close enough", then 
  spending a lot of time and money on color management may not make sense. 
 Back to Top   |